Karlson: "Tramp bi mogao da naredi nuklearni napad na Iran"

Karlson tvrdi da bi meta bila planina Pikaks u srednjem Iranu, gde je, prema navodima izraelskih obaveštajaca, iranska vlada ponovo pokrenula program obogaćivanja uranijuma. Navodi da se postrojenja nalaze u tunelima ispod približno 90 metara čvrstog granita, zbog čega ih ne može uništiti nijedno konvencionalno oružje u američkom arsenalu.- Jedina vojna mogućnost jeste nuklearni napad. Netanjahu snažno pritiska Trampa da ga izvede -napisao je Karlson, pozivajući se i na neimenovanog upućenog sagovornika.- Bibi svakodnevno zove Trampa zbog toga -preneo je njegovu izjavu.Karlson za ove tvrdnje nije ponudio javno proverljive dokaze, a nije poznato ni da li zaista postoji američki plan nuklearnog napada. Prema Karlsonovim tvrdnjama, Netanjahu je u veoma teškom političkom položaju nakon prošlonedeljnih izraelskih izbora.Tvrdi da izraelski premijer ne može da sastavi vladu bez Trampovog direktnog posredovanja, kojim bi osigurao podršku najmanje 61 zastupnika u Knesetu. U suprotnom bi, smatra Karlson, Netanjahu izgubio premijersku dužnost i suočio se s istragama, a možda i zatvorskom kaznom.- Netanjahu mora ostati blizak Trampu. Potreban mu je ovaj rat -napisao je.Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. &ldquo;Bibi calls Trump about it every day,&rdquo; says an informed observer. Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week&rsquo;s election results, he can&rsquo;t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war. To that end, he&rsquo;s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they&rsquo;ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu&rsquo;s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha. The rest of America&rsquo;s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won&rsquo;t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people. And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final. We&rsquo;ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America&rsquo;s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called &ldquo;battlefield nukes&rdquo; easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we&rsquo;re on the brink of it. Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he&rsquo;s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made. They&rsquo;re right, though it won&rsquo;t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making. One group that hasn&rsquo;t been consulted so far is the global population &mdash; the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.&mdash; Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) November 2, 2026Karlson tvrdi da Netanjahu posebno snažno pritiska svoje saveznike u američkoj administraciji, uključujući ministra odbrane Pita Hegseta i komandanta američkeCentralne komande Breda Kupera. Obojica se, prema njegovim navodima, protive pregovaračkom rešenju sukoba i zagovaraju obnovu velikih borbenih operacija.Tvrdi i da Netanjahuovu politiku slede američki šef diplomatije Marko Rubio, direktor CIA-e DŽon Radklif i lideri Demokratske stranke. Navodi da je bivši predsednik Barak Obama na nedavnom sastanku izrazio protivljenje mirovnom sporazumu s Iranom koji se priprema u Dohi.Karlson tvrdi da su američki dugogodišnji saveznici na Bliskom istoku uplašeni mogućnošću nastavka rata. Prema njegovim informacijama, Netanjahu je 27. septembra tajno otputovao u Abu Dabi kako bi pridobio Ujedinjene Arapske Emirate za konačni napad na Iran, ali je odbijen.Foto: Tony Smith/Alamy/ProfimediaUpozorava da je osam meseci sukoba ozbiljno ugrozilo privede zalivskih država, kao i svetska tržišta energenata i veštačkih đubriva. Navodi da u svetu postoji približno 850 velikih tankera za prevoz nafte te da je samo u oktobru njih 11 teško oštećeno u Ormuskom moreuzu.Karlson smatra da bi nastavak takvih napada mogao da izazove svetsku privrednu depresiju, dok bi nuklearni udar dodatno ubrzao razaranje. Tvrdi i da bi nuklearna eksplozija na planini Pikaks mogla radioaktivno zagaditi Persijski zaliv i ugroziti snabdevanje pitkom vodom za 100 miliona ljudi.Foto: Robin Rayne/Zuma Press/ProfimediaOn upozorava da bi američka upotreba nuklearnog oružja protiv Irana mogla da podstakneslične napade u drugim delovima sveta. Tvrdi da je Rusija već poručila najmanje dvema drugim vladama kako bi joj američki nuklearni napad dao opravdanje za upotrebu nuklearnog oružja protiv Ukrajine.Smatra da bi takav presedan mogao da podstakne iPakistan i Indiju na međusobne nuklearne napade, kao iSevernu Koreju na napad na Južnu Koreju.- Nakon prvog nuklearnog udara Treći svetski rat biće neizbežan. Taj rat biće kratak i konačan -napisao je.Karlson tvrdi i da Trampova administracija od februara postupno menja američku nuklearnu doktrinu kako bi olakšala prvu upotrebu taktičkog nuklearnog oružja. Optužuje političare ove velikeameričke stranke da takvim promenama ne posvećuju dovoljno pažnje.Prema Karlsonovim informacijama, Tramp zasad okleva i sluša argumente potpredsednika DŽej-Dija Vensa, kao i svog izaslanika Stiva Vitkofa. Obojica smatraju da je još moguće postići diplomatski sporazum s Iranom.Foto: Gripas Yuri/ABACA/Abaca Press/ProfimediaKarlson se slaže s njihovom procenom, iako upozorava da pregovori neće biti jednostavni. Tvrdi da su pojedini delovi iranske vlasti postali radikalniji nakon što su ajatolah Ali Hamnei i članovi njegove porodice ubijeni u februaru te da čak i umereniji iranski zvanični teško razumeju način donošenja političkih odluka na Zapadu.Kao primer navodi, prema njegovim rečima, uverenje u Teheranu da američka vlada kontroliše Izrael. Ipak, pozivajući se na osobe koje su razgovarale s iranskim donosiocima odluka, tvrdi da među njima postoji saglasnost kako bi nastavak rata bio štetan za sve i da je bitno da pokušaju da postignu sporazum postići sporazum.- Jedina grupa koju dosad niko nije konsultovao jeste svetsko stanovništvo, stotine miliona ljudi koji će, zajedno sa svojom decom, biti ubijeni ako Netanjahu nagovori Trampa da sledeće nedeljeizvede nuklearni napad. Sada je vreme da se i njihov glas čuje -zaključio je Karlson.BONUS VIDEO:

Karlson: "Tramp bi mogao da naredi nuklearni napad na Iran"

Vaš komentar

Nema komentara